If you want to improve your Bing Ads performance consistently and profitably, implementing advanced A/B testing strategies is one of the most reliable ways to do it. A/B testing in Bing Ads allows marketers to experiment with ad elements—such as headlines, descriptions, landing pages, audience segments, bidding strategies, and even campaign structures—to identify exactly what drives higher CTR, lower CPC, and stronger conversion rates. In this guide, you’ll learn advanced A/B testing frameworks, what to test first, how to interpret results correctly, and how to scale winning variations for ongoing performance improvement.
If you need expert hands-on help implementing high-level A/B testing frameworks, you can check out our Bing Ads management services to accelerate performance from day one.
While Microsoft Advertising (Bing Ads) has become increasingly automated with features like automated bidding, audience expansion, and responsive search ads, the platforms still rely heavily on high-quality inputs. A/B testing helps you control those inputs by allowing you to evaluate which creative, audience, or bidding elements produce the best outcomes.
Without strong testing, campaigns rely on guesswork—and guesswork leads to wasted spend, misaligned targeting, and inconsistent performance.
Competition is rising in Bing Ads as more advertisers diversify away from Google Ads.
AI bidding works best with strong creative signals, which A/B testing helps refine.
User behavior changes quickly, making regular testing a necessity rather than an option.
Audience diversity on Bing (such as older demographics and higher-income users) means small changes can have large performance impacts.
Mastering A/B testing gives you the power to influence your campaign’s direction with precision.
In Bing Ads, A/B testing traditionally focuses on comparing two versions of an element, such as headline A vs. headline B. However, advanced advertisers can go further by using A/B/n tests, where multiple variations are evaluated at the same time.
When testing one variable at a time
For high-traffic campaigns with clear goals
When you want fast, clean data
When exploring new ad message themes
When creating multiple versions of landing pages
When testing 3–5 new audience segments
When experimenting with several bidding strategies in parallel
A/B/n testing gives broader data but also requires more impressions. For smaller budgets, classic A/B testing is still more reliable.
To run valid A/B tests, you need a controlled environment where only one variable changes at a time. This ensures accurate attribution of performance differences.
Duplicate ad groups so each version has equal structure
Use identical targeting, except for the variable you’re testing
Ensure equal budget distribution
Let Microsoft Ads experiments run at least 2–4 weeks for statistical significance
Turn off automated settings that may interfere, such as ad rotation optimizations
The more controlled your environment, the cleaner your data—and the stronger your conclusions.
Most advertisers simply rewrite headlines, but advanced strategies go deeper by aligning messaging variations with different user intents.
| Intent Type | Example Headline |
|---|---|
| Commercial | “Compare the Best [Product] Options Today” |
| Transactional | “Buy [Product] with Free Shipping” |
| Urgency-Based | “Last Chance: 50% Off [Product]” |
| Trust-Based | “Rated #1 by 4,000+ Customers” |
Test intent segmentation rather than simple rewriting. For example:
Version A: Transactional messaging
Version B: Trust-driven messaging
This helps you find the message that resonates most with Bing’s older and higher-income audience segments.
While RSAs automate combinations, you can still test concepts by:
Pinning certain headlines
Locking specific descriptions
Testing clusters of messages (e.g., price-focused vs. feature-focused)
Evaluating RSA performance against an ETA (if still in account archives)
Create two RSAs with entirely different topic clusters:
RSA A: Price, discounts, and deals
RSA B: Quality, durability, long-term value
This tests not just individual headlines but the entire messaging identity.
This is where some of the biggest performance lifts happen.
In-market audiences vs. remarketing lists
Custom audiences vs. LinkedIn profile targeting
Demographic bid adjustments (age, gender, income)
Device-specific audience sets
Create two identical campaigns except for the following:
Campaign A → Uses in-market audiences + broad match
Campaign B → Uses remarketing lists + phrase match
This will show whether you perform better with warm audiences or cold intent-based segments.
You can run landing-page A/B tests directly from Bing’s Experiment tool.
Short-form vs. long-form landing pages
Different call-to-action (CTA) placements
Simplified forms vs. multi-step forms
Mobile-first layouts vs. desktop-first
Testimonials above-the-fold vs. below-the-fold
Instead of simply testing CTA copy, test the psychology behind CTAs:
Version A: “Get Your Free Quote” (value-based)
Version B: “Start Saving Today” (outcome-based)
These subtle shifts often produce large conversion lifts.
Most advertisers experiment with ads or landing pages but rarely test bidding strategies. This is a huge opportunity.
Manual CPC vs. Maximize Clicks
Maximize Conversions vs. Target CPA
Target ROAS vs. Maximize Conversion Value
Switching bid strategies at different budget levels
Campaign A runs on manual CPC with broad match
Campaign B runs on Target CPA with broad match
This helps determine whether your campaign benefits from automation or requires more control.
Let bidding tests run longer—typically 3–6 weeks—because algorithm-based strategies need learning time.
Bing’s audience tends to behave differently than Google’s, especially in certain niches.
Business hours vs. 24/7
Weekday-only vs. weekend-only
Morning vs. evening campaigns
Device-specific schedules
Run two identical campaigns:
Version A: Shows ads during business hours
Version B: Runs ads all day
This helps reveal when your audience converts at the highest ROI—data many advertisers never uncover.
Once you move past basic A/B testing, you’ll want a structure that allows deeper, more strategic insights. Multi-layered testing frameworks help you test multiple elements over time without creating statistical noise.
You break your testing phases into clear steps:
Phase 1 — Ad Messaging Tests
Test headlines, descriptions, and RSA content themes.
Phase 2 — Audience & Targeting Tests
Experiment with in-market audiences, remarketing lists, demographics, and devices.
Phase 3 — Bidding Strategy Tests
Test manual vs. automated bids after you have stable creative and audience performance.
Phase 4 — Landing Page Optimization Tests
Test layout, CTA styles, UX design differences, and funnel depth.
This order prevents overlapping variables from corrupting test results.
You’re eliminating noise and improving each advertising layer before moving on to the next. As a result, your final performance is not just based on isolated wins, but on a fully optimized advertising system.
Advanced marketers know when to run sequential tests (one after another) and parallel tests (simultaneously).
You run these when:
Budget is limited
Traffic volume is low
Tests require high precision
Variables influence each other
Example:
Don’t test ad copy and landing pages at the same time—your results may mix variables.
Run these when:
You have large volume and high budgets
Tests are unrelated
You’re testing big-picture variables
Example:
Test audiences while simultaneously testing bidding strategies, as long as each test occurs in separate campaign structures.
Most advertisers only look at CTR or CPC when evaluating tests—but advanced strategists go much deeper.
Quality Score impact
Expected CTR shifts
Landing page experience score
Conversion rate by device
Conversion rate by audience
Revenue per conversion (if using ROAS)
Customer lifetime value (LTV)
These insights show not only which version wins—but why.
Statistical significance ensures your results are not random.
At least 2–4 weeks testing period
At least 500–1,000 impressions per variation
Aim for 95% statistical confidence
Avoid stopping tests too early (common mistake)
If you end tests early, you risk choosing the wrong winner—leading to long-term performance decline.
Your A/B testing accuracy depends heavily on your attribution model.
Position-based attribution (good for lead generation)
Data-driven attribution (best for ecommerce)
Last-click attribution (useful for retargeting tests)
Choosing the right model ensures your reported conversions align with real user behavior.
Most people test ads, but few test negative keyword variations—even though this can dramatically improve campaign profitability.
Version A: Broad negative keywords
Version B: Specific, long-tail negative keywords
You can quickly learn whether tighter filters produce higher conversion quality.
Instead of just using broad match, phrase match, or exact match, test how mixing them affects performance.
Campaign A → 70% broad, 30% exact
Campaign B → 50% broad, 50% phrase
Campaign C → 100% exact match
This reveals which structure delivers the most profitable search intent.
Bing Ads has unique audience distribution—desktop performance is often stronger than mobile, especially for B2B or high-ticket offers.
Desktop-only vs. mobile-only campaigns
Mobile vs. tablet
Different landing pages for different devices
Device-level bid adjustments A/B tests
These tests often uncover extremely profitable segments.
A layered geo-demo test shows how different age groups or income brackets behave in different regions.
Compare these setups:
Version A: U.S. + ages 25–34
Version B: U.S. + ages 45–64
Version C: UK + income 10% (highest income bracket)
Version D: Canada + devices: desktop only
This kind of multi-segment testing is where you uncover hidden profitable pockets.
Never scale a winning test immediately. First:
Run the same winning test again in a different campaign
Validate the performance twice
Check seasonality
Compare with historical benchmarks
Only scale when the pattern appears consistent.
Once validated, increase budget in controlled steps:
Week 1: +10%
Week 2: +15%
Week 3: +20%
Week 4: +30%
Scaling too quickly often resets the learning phase of automated bidding strategies, harming performance.
Once your winning ad copy or landing page is validated, expand audiences by adding:
Lookalike audiences
Broader in-market categories
Similar remarketing lists
Geographic expansion
Higher-income brackets
Ensure only one expansion variable is added at a time.
This causes:
Mixed metrics
Dirty data
Inaccurate winners
Always test one major variable at a time unless running controlled A/B/n structures.
Many advertisers stop tests when early results look promising—but Bing’s user base behaves differently throughout the week.
Always let tests run a minimum of 14 days, preferably 30 days.
If you judge your A/B test using aggregated data only, you might miss insights such as:
One version working better for mobile users
One ad resonating more with older audiences
One landing page converting better on desktop
To run advanced tests, segment everything.
You must keep the environment stable—never modify:
Bids
Extensions
Budgets
Keywords
Targeting
Automated bidding strategy
Changing any of these ruins your test integrity.
A serious Bing Ads program runs tests continuously.
Quarter 1: Messaging + headline optimization
Quarter 2: Audience segmentation tests
Quarter 3: Landing page conversion optimization
Quarter 4: Bidding strategy refinement
This ensures your account evolves every quarter.
Track tests with:
Start/end dates
Variables tested
Results
Statistical confidence
Lessons learned
Actions implemented
This gives your testing program strategic direction over time.
Since both networks behave differently, cross-platform insights help you:
Identify universal winning messages
Spot platform-specific opportunities
Optimize seasonal performance
Improve bidding strategy accuracy
Cross-channel testing makes your PPC operation stronger overall.
Advanced Bing Ads A/B testing is no longer optional—it’s the foundation of consistent growth, lower acquisition costs, and scalable ad performance. By testing headlines, audiences, bidding strategies, landing pages, device behavior, and demographic segments, you’re no longer guessing—you’re making data-driven strategic decisions that compound results over time.
A/B testing transforms your Bing Ads account from a basic setup into a high-performance advertising machine.
If you want a specialist to run advanced experiments, optimize your bidding strategies, and scale your Microsoft Ads profitably, explore our professional Bing Ads management services to get expert support.
Marketing LTB is a full-service marketing agency offering over 50 specialized services across 100+ industries. Our seasoned team leverages data-driven strategies and a full-funnel approach to maximize your ROI and fuel business growth.
Bill Nash is the CMO of Marketing LTB with over a decade of experience, he has driven growth for Fortune 500 companies and startups through data-driven campaigns and advanced marketing technologies. He has written over 400 pieces of content about marketing, covering topics like marketing tips, guides, AI in advertising, advanced PPC strategies, conversion optimization, and others.